1 · Upload your metadata
Screening thresholds
| Q1 comparison | Association measure | Priority |
|---|---|---|
| Categorical–categorical | Cramér’s V | ≥ 0.40 |
| Categorical–continuous | Eta | ≥ 0.40 |
| Continuous–continuous | Absolute Spearman correlation | ≥ 0.40 |
If no variable meets the main threshold, associations from 0.20 to below 0.40 are shown. These are teaching priorities, not proof of confounding. SMD and Duncan do not select variables at Q1.
After Q2/Q3 flag a potential confounder, examine shared categories and distributions/ranges. SMD and Duncan support imbalance assessment. High imbalance or correlation alone does not establish complete confounding.
Q1 is descriptive: related specimens remain in the screen, so subjects contributing more specimens may influence it more. Technical repeats are counted once using specimen ID where available. When “Same specimen” is selected without specimen IDs, the subject ID is used.
Load a worked case study:
No sheet loaded.
